Mykiss always sends me URLs thru IM, everytime she found a hilarious, time wasters, eyecandy sites or blogs and so far these are the collections I have from her: http://www.flashportal.com/playmovie.php?id=1988 http://gizmo2u.com/transform-your-skirt-into-vending-machine http://www.jimmyr.com/blog/Toilets_from_Around_World_226_2007.php http://www.ivoryboy.com/difference.html http://www.nobodyhere.com/justme/nose_send.here http://rinkworks.com/said/courtroom.shtml http://www.zefrank.com/flowers/ http://www.zuzafun.com/best-of-national-geographic-pictures-of-the-year http://pileofphotos.com/view/159/Unusual-moments-caught-on-film http://patterngame.com/linesuperfollow.swf http://www.theircircularlife.it/frameset.htm http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/wireframe http://www.scientificpsychic.com/graphics/ http://dura.cell.free.fr/home/swf/arms12.swf http://www.mysticalball.com/ http://toofunnypictures.blogspot.com/ http://www.quizilla.com/users/kylefer/quizzes/... http://hyferjennic.jotb
Science Daily — According to a new study published in The Journal of Sexual Medicine, sexual sensation in circumcised and uncircumcised men may not be so different after all. The research, performed in the Department of Psychology of McGill University in Montreal, consisted of genital sensory testing conducted on circumcised and uncircumcised men during states of sexual arousal and non-arousal. Results showed that no difference between the two groups was found in sensitivity to touch or pain. “This study suggests that preconceptions of penile sensory differences between circumcised and uncircumcised men may be unfounded,” says Kimberley Payne, Ph.D, principal author of the study.
Comments
genuine indeed.